> it's clear that observation and model are being conflated How so? > [cosmology] isn't a science the way that, for example, physics is. Why not? > I'm sur

> it's clear that observation and model are being conflated How so? > [cosmology] isn't a science the way that, for example, physics is. Why not? > I'm sure many will disagree with this factually more accurate description, because of the emotional role their ideation of science plays in their lives Perhaps i will once i understand what you're going on about.