3 ms·

I set out my interpretation and I was inviting you to clarify.

• incrudible 6y ago
  Consider that "the legal system ideally ought to exist for the benefit of capital owners who commit fraud" is an opinion that is so absurd, not even a capital owner who commits fraud could possibly hold it. Therefore, either you are calling me an idiot in a rather obtuse fashion, or you're confused about the proper way to interpret another person's standpoint. The principle of charity tells me that the latter interpretation must be preferred. I invite you to apply this principle in kind.