3 ms·
If you want people to know what you're saying, you need to unpack your comment more than your initial one. I also read this as a snide aside about his love life
by frereubu 6y ago
If you want people to know what you're saying, you need to unpack your comment more than your initial one. I also read this as a snide aside about his love life, which is a pretty easy interpretation. Do you have a link to something more substantive than your comments here?
Edit: The quote seems pretty clear - "we see it in the data" - which would just be a higher rate of infections in children, and he's clearly speaking as a member of NERVTAG, not just as himself.
- flukus 6y agoI think this argument is just a variant of: 1. Scientist predicts x by y. 2. Politicians take action to prevent x by y. 3. x by y didn't happen, therefor scientists were wrong. It's like complaining your sys admins do nothing because nothing ever breaks. Or that Y2K was a conspiracy theory because it was prevented.