4 ms·
The onus is not on physicists to counter flat-earth claims, they just have to point to the facts As such, here are the facts in the Skripal case: https://www.c
by jack_riminton 6y ago
The onus is not on physicists to counter flat-earth claims, they just have to point to the facts
As such, here are the facts in the Skripal case: https://www.counterterrorism.police.uk/salisbury/ https://www.counterterrorism.police.uk/salisbury/
- pmoriarty 6y ago"The onus is not on physicists to counter flat-earth claims, they just have to point to the facts" Yeah, but the guy on the linked-to page is not making claims. He's just asking why. It would be far more useful for you or someone else to provide a link that answered his specific questions in detail rather than give a link to a non-specific information dump that does not specifically address those questions.
- jack_riminton 6y agoI’d rather point out the absurdity of two known Russian FSB operatives saying they were there to admire Salisbury’s famous 123m spire An information dump is far more beneficial to the discussion of the case than a discredited former ambassador who tends to side with kleptocratic maniacs in Russia
- jessaustin 6y agoCommentators ITT seem careful not to mention Murray's tireless advocacy for Julian Assange, while other journalists and former ambassadors have ignored his case entirely.