3 ms·
I find this to be a questionable interpretation of the actual data. The TRE in-person group lost more than double the amount of percentage weight than the contr
by incrudible 6y ago
I find this to be a questionable interpretation of the actual data. The TRE in-person group lost more than double the amount of percentage weight than the control group. The reason that it is not statistically significant is that the P value is too high, but that is to be expected from a study with such few participants.
- derbOac 6y agoYeah, it's classic effect size versus p-value and one reason meta-analysis was invented. I find the concerns about lean versus fat mass more convincing but there's lots of issues with the study and the conclusions they're drawing. I also think the "no control group" is very fuzzy. The idea of pre-post with no control group, explicitly (via experimental manipulation) or implicitly (through observation of low/null/absent values of the independent variable) is kinda odd.