3 ms·
>> The whole point of using biological weapons like these is that it's almost impossible to prove that poisoning actually took a place. No one would ever find o
by janeroe 6y ago
>> The whole point of using biological weapons like these is that it's almost impossible to prove that poisoning actually took a place. No one would ever find out for sure if he would die and only reason he still alive is few lucky conditions.
I've read your post and realized that, though not affiliated with the country in any way, even I know a few Putin's opponents who died somewhat unexpectedly. A blogger Anton Nosik comes to mind. Can it be that killings are more common than we think?
- sam_lowry_ 6y agoAnton Nosik is the least suspicious case. He was never very vocal politically and he was a heavy drinker all the way through his life, Ashmanov described his lifestyle in great detail some 10 years before Nosik died.
- rudnevr 6y agoKillings are definitely more common. It's difficult to attribute all the untimely deaths to FSB activities, but given they want exactly this, we probably should do the opposite. Schekochikhin, Kara-Murza poisoning. Zhvaniya in Georgia. Yuschenko, Babchenko, Sheremet in Ukraine. Berezovsky, Perepelichny, Patarkatsishvili, Skripals, Litvinenko in UK. Tsepov, Manevitch in Putin's native Saint Petersbourg. Nemtsov, Politkovskaya, Navalny in Russia. Also some bad guys, like Khattab, who was killed via poisoned letter. By no means it's an exhaustive list. Not Nosik, though. He was a well-known addict and kind of had it coming, so there's no commonly shared suspicion around this.