3 ms·
> then literally any action is permissible What's permissible now is whatever doesn't harm or constrain upper classes. We've decided that essential workers sh
by gnusty_gnurc 6y ago
> then literally any action is permissible
What's permissible now is whatever doesn't harm or constrain upper classes.
We've decided that essential workers should work and the higher classes should be sheltered and they can dispatch the expendables to sustain themselves.
Your moral analysis is pretty much in support of whatever the Pajama Class decides is right.
- ineedasername 6y agoThen you are reading too much into my analysis. My post was simply a discussion on the process of determining precautions, absent going to an extreme. It was not advocacy for the specific place on the spectrum where the line should be drawn. It was, in response to your comment, an observation that no matter where the line is drawn, there will be some who view it violates their freedom as too authoritarian, and others who believe it violates their freedom by allowing irresponsible decisions by others to impact them. I won't go into the particulars of my own opinion on where the lines should be drawn except to say that I think some decisions have been bad, some have been okay, but that in general this is not a situation that lends itself to easy answers.