2 ms·

Leaves OSS out of all their lenses. That's what they do. Annoys me that the best fast prime for my sony A6100 (sigma f1.4s) won't work for video because of this

• samatman 6y ago
  This was what pushed me to get the a6600, the autofocus on the fast Sigma primes is quite adequate, good even, and IBIS means I can do some video off-the-hand if I'm careful. The much larger battery was also a factor. My use case also involves a fair amount of tripod work, and I even picked up a gimbal just recently. So I'm glad that Sigma is making lenses which are cheaper / better for the price by leaving out OSS, because there are ways to not need it. If you figure OSS would cost another $200 per lens, which seems a little low but is in the ballpark, then with the Sigma 'trio' of 1.4 primes, the difference between the a6100 and a6600 is just about a wash.
• throwaway201103 6y ago
  OSS is.... ?
  • stan_rogers 6y ago
    OIS (optical image stabilization) mistyped or "branded".