4 ms·
I disagree, for the same reason that forums typically ban trolls rather than just let them be. It takes an order of magnitude more effort to defend against a c
by curryst 6y ago
I disagree, for the same reason that forums typically ban trolls rather than just let them be. It takes an order of magnitude more effort to defend against a claim than it does to make the claim.
I could hypothetically accuse you of being a rapist right now. I can just pick a random day I say it happened, let's say last February 23rd. Cool, it took me about 30 seconds to come up with that. Let's say I then blast that all over Twitter and Facebook. Are you okay with having no legal recourse? Are you okay with "jrockway is a rapist" being one of the top Google results for your name? Maybe it's better, maybe you did really well and your rebuttal is the first Google result. I would still be really uncomfortable that my first Google result is me attempting to say that I'm not a rapist.
That's assuming people will even read your defense. There are some classes of accusations where you will be tried in the court of public opinion before you are even aware, and your attempts at defense will only be interpreted as further evidence that you are guilty. The rise of Fake News accusations should tell you exactly how much telling the truth is going to help your case.
Rape is a particularly heinous thing to accuse someone of, but I chose it specifically because of the "believe the victim's narrative" messaging that surrounds it. Accusations of a crime fall under defamation laws, and so long as they don't file a police report about it, defamation is the only law I'm aware of that it would violate.
- jrockway 6y agoIs it worth suppressing life-saving science to clean up my Google profile, though? Everything can be abused, but some abuse is more harmful than others. As the laws stand right now, legitimate science journals are afraid to publish legitimate science. That's super bad.