4 ms·
I think you are missing the scale and reaching for a political point where one does not need to be made. There are 500 CEOs in the SP500 and 164 million women
by frockington1 6y ago
I think you are missing the scale and reaching for a political point where one does not need to be made.
There are 500 CEOs in the SP500 and 164 million women in the US. The supply increase of 164 million women will have a far greater impact on the common persons salary than 500 CEOs getting paid more
- jayd16 6y agoIsn't that still like $7b[1] at the average 15m? Compare that to $45k[2] * for the 76k[3] women in the workforce, that's only ~$3.5b. Its US women vs the global S&P list, but it is interesting to compare, now that you mention it. [1]https://aflcio.org/paywatch https://aflcio.org/paywatch [2]https://www.catalyst.org/research/womens-earnings-the-pay-gap/#:~:text=A%20Gender%20Wage%20Gap%20Exists,time%2C%20year%2Dround%20workers.&text=This%20is%20compared%20to%2060.2%25%20in%201980.&text=Women%20earned%20a%20median%20of,2018%2C%20and%20men%20earned%20%2455%2C291 https://www.catalyst.org/research/womens-earnings-the-pay-ga.... [3]https://www.catalyst.org/research/women-in-the-workforce-united-states/#:~:text=Covid%2D19%20Is%20Disrupting%20Women's%20Labor%20Force%20Participation&text=In%202019%2C%20there%20were%2076%2C852%2C000,of%20the%20total%20labor%20force.&text=57.4%25%20of%20women%20participated%20in,compared%20to%2069.2%25%20of%20men https://www.catalyst.org/research/women-in-the-workforce-uni....
- s1artibartfast 6y agoyour math is of by a factor of 1000X. Per your link, there are 76 million women in the workforce, not 76k. That is $7 billion to CEOs vs $3.5 Trillion for women.
- jayd16 6y agoderp. Of course.
- JohnPrine 6y ago*76m women in the workforce