4 ms·
It's definitely more than 1-2 dollars, but not so high that subscriptions would be too expensive for users. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/03/facebooks-average-r
by bun_at_work 6y ago
It's definitely more than 1-2 dollars, but not so high that subscriptions would be too expensive for users.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/03/facebooks-average-revenue-per-user-leads-social-media-companies.html https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/03/facebooks-average-revenue-pe...
- anchpop 6y agoAlthough the average revenue per user who would be willing to spend $7/quarter is probably much higher (these users are disproportionately likely to have disposable income which probably makes them more attractive to advertisers)
- virgilp 6y agoI think nobody would mind advertisers being able to target to "subscribers". What people don't want is the ability of advertisers to target "white male who works at ACME, lives in north Fairview and bought a car last week" (which might narrow it down to just you). That said, I definitely believe that collecting subscription money would not stop them from trying to collect data about you, for advertising purposes. They'd view subscription as just a new revenue stream (yay!).
- grumple 6y agoIt's like cable tv has come full circle... you pay for tv without ads, then they start having ads. Facebook will never stop collecting data on its users as long as it exists.
- ghaff 6y agoIf Facebook were to charge just $1/month, I'd be willing to bet they'd still lose 80% of their users, at which point, the value would be decreased enough for the remaining 20% most of them would leave too.