3 ms·
So you agree with Facebook that their revenue stream is more important than our privacy? If you don’t agree, then how else do you propose Apple enforces said p
by doctor_eval 6y ago
So you agree with Facebook that their revenue stream is more important than our privacy?
If you don’t agree, then how else do you propose Apple enforces said privacy?
I mean these third party apps are running on Apple’s platform and using Apple’s APIs to track Apple’s customers. Who else can fix this problem?
- echelon 6y ago> So you agree with Facebook that their revenue stream is more important than our privacy? No. I think our freedom is more important than both. > If you don’t agree, then how else do you propose Apple enforces said privacy? Apple is making decisions that are too big for it. The DOJ needs to break them up. Computing needs to be free. I'm fine if the platform makes these notices apparent, but Apple can't be the arbiter.
- doctor_eval 6y agoI don’t understand your position. There are many types of “freedom”. Is it freedom for Facebook to invade our privacy that you care about? Or do you care about allowing people to be free from privacy invasion? Both freedoms cannot exist simultaneously. So are you saying that Apple should not be allowed to decide which freedom to prioritise? Despite the fact that every other comparable company is effectively on the side of Facebook? Or is there some other kind of freedom you care about? You seem to say that “our freedom” is more important than our privacy, but privacy is a most fundamental type of freedom - literally, the freedom to think our own thoughts. What other freedom could be more important than that?