> Which all doesn't matter at all because it'll recover afterwards. Framing it as an ecological disaster is just a way... That is a _very_ odd definition of a

> Which all doesn't matter at all because it'll recover afterwards. Framing it as an ecological disaster is just a way... That is a _very_ odd definition of a disaster. The Earth recovered from several mass extinction events. Does that mean that they were not in point of fact, disasters? That nothing is a disaster? It is a localised disaster. Not all disasters have to be on the global scale to have relevance.