3 ms·
SF Bay Area. It's been a couple of years, but, IIRC, 100 or 200Mbps was $65/mo and the same plan with cable TV was $60. I've actually never had any issues with
by rconti 6y ago
SF Bay Area. It's been a couple of years, but, IIRC, 100 or 200Mbps was $65/mo and the same plan with cable TV was $60. I've actually never had any issues with the quality of their service, I just hate the scripted CSR/upsell situation. But that's the same everywhere.
I briefly had gigabit with them for $140/mo, just because I could. (because I've complained for so many years that if I could get gigabit, I would). 1000 down/50 up or similar. But eventually the novelty wore off and I downgraded to 250.
Currently for me, symmetric gigabit is $80/mo with ATT, $90 resold by sonic, but if/when Sonic brings their service directly it's $60.
As a 2 person household, yeah, I'd have a hard time saying 25Mbps down is not enough. It's a lot of work to use 100 down, forget gigabit. And there's a bit difference between filling a 100mbps pipe, and actually being limited by it.