3 ms·
> and will likely have to license There are already a dozen other electric models on the streets. Why should they have to license from Tesla? The electric engi
by foepys 6y ago
> and will likely have to license
There are already a dozen other electric models on the streets. Why should they have to license from Tesla? The electric engine part of the vehicles is actually not that hard - it's the battery that is complicated and Tesla doesn't even produce the batteries in their cars. That's done by Panasonic.
VW, Toyota, Nissan have supply chain management under control, they don't need to learn it from Tesla.
- saalweachter 6y agoHeck, let's also not forget that patents aren't copyright. Patents last 20 years, and it's not unusual for 5 of those to past between filing and the invention being turned into a usable product that hits the market.
- pkulak 6y agoThat new motor that Tesla uses is pretty amazing, and must at least be difficult since almost no other companies use it and instead just deal with reduced range and efficiency.
- gamblor956 6y agoTesla's motor isn't what drives the range and efficiency; the battery assembly is their key differentiator. Tesla currently has the industry-leading thermal design; it's ability to cool batteries and prevent thermal-based degradation is far more efficient/effective than anything that competitors have yet been able to put on the market. Supposedly GM's Ultium battery platform will equal or exceed Tesla's batteries, but that remains to be seen as the first Ultium-based cars don't come out until 2H 2021 and all we have to go on right now are press releases. VW holds some patents and exclusive licenses on solid state batteries, and is planning to go all EV within the next few years, though the SSB autos aren't expected until 2025 at the earliest, assuming VW is able to commercialize the technology.
- pkulak 6y agoRange went up about 10% when they switched to the "Raven" motor. That ain't nothin'.