3 ms·

It was actually 43% https://appleinsider.com/articles/20/06/09/how-arm-has-already-saved-apple---twice https://appleinsider.com/articles/20/06/09/how-arm-has-a

• zimpenfish 6y ago
  I can't find any contemporary reporting that says it was 43% - from what I can see, the first mention of 43% seems to come from this - https://www.cultofmac.com/97055/this-is-how-arm-saved-apple-from-going-bust-1990s/ https://www.cultofmac.com/97055/this-is-how-arm-saved-apple-... - which is bonkers wrong about the initial investment ($1.5b!). Do you have anything pre-dating this nonsense article which says it was 43%?
  • klelatti 6y ago
    page 38 http://archive.computerhistory.org/resources/access/text/2015/04/102739951-05-01-acc.pdf http://archive.computerhistory.org/resources/access/text/201... Edit: Ah I see Cult of Mac quoted Hauser. Well Hauser was a director of Acorn at the time. Also Robin Saxby talks about Apple and Acorn investing $1.5m and VLSI $250k so with some shares for staff that would be about 43%.
    • zimpenfish 6y ago
      tl;dr: 43% might be right. Saxby talks about £1.5M from Apple and according to https://fxtop.com/en/historical-currency-converter.php?A=1500000&C1=GBP&C2=USD&DD=27&MM=11&YYYY=1990&B=1&P=&I=1&btnOK=Go%21 https://fxtop.com/en/historical-currency-converter.php?A=150..., £1.5M is just about $3M which I guess clears up the $3M number.
      • klelatti 6y ago
        I actually checked companies house but sadly the company (the original Arm Holdings) concerned no longer exists!