3 ms·
This entire discussion is about privately held organizations systematically charging customers for services they did not receive with no oversight to prevent it
by bigbob2 6y ago
This entire discussion is about privately held organizations systematically charging customers for services they did not receive with no oversight to prevent it. Your argument doesn't even make sense in this context.
- tw25485966 6y agoSome would argue that those "privately held organizations" are able to avoid market pressures via regulatory capture, if not outright grants of monopoly by governments. If you want to argue that a government-granted public monopoly is better for consumers than a government-granted private monopoly, I'd be inclined to agree. But there are other options that might be better still for consumers, which is what I think the above poster was trying to get at.
- kaczordon 6y agoYeah you summed it up better than I did.