4 ms·
I think your last question highlights that you really wouldn’t run this locally. Probably on a VPS or something with a ton of bandwidth. I’m sure someone else
by bronco21016 6y ago
I think your last question highlights that you really wouldn’t run this locally. Probably on a VPS or something with a ton of bandwidth.
I’m sure someone else will have better usage benchmarks but bandwidth is likely to be the biggest constraint. Number of streamers is roughly going to be available bandwidth divided by bitrate of stream.
- gabekangas 6y agoOne option is offloading the bandwidth requirements to a S3 provider. You could run your server from home and keep your local outbound requirements low, you'd just be handing off the video to somebody who can handle it. Depending on your scale many S3 providers can be pretty cheap. I know of one person who does this specific setup and it's been working great for him!
- bronco21016 6y agoI noticed that as an option once I started looking closer. That's pretty nice! Just gotta be careful to estimate and monitor costs but depending on the use case it could make a very compelling option.