4 ms·

Does the displays on Windows look as crispy as on MacOS? That's the fear I have of switching away. I love how crisp to the eye everything is.

• armada651 6y ago
  On Windows you decide how crisp you want your display. There are plenty of hardware options with Retina-equivalent DPI.
  • throwii 6y ago
    I was probably too much into their marketing. Is it the same for Linux/Archlinux?
    • herbstein 6y ago
      Tonsky, the creator of the popular 'Fira Code' monospace font, has a great blog post about monitor DPI and font rendering. A big section is on just how terrible font rendering and display scaling on a modern Mac really is. https://tonsky.me/blog/monitors/ https://tonsky.me/blog/monitors/
      • throwii 6y ago
        I only use the desktop mac so that's not much an issue probably, there it is probably 2x scaling. Interesting how Windows can handle anything as long as the hardware supports it!
      • aksss 6y ago
        Good read.. at the end I was like Loyd: “so you’re telling me there’s a chance..” XD
    • AsyncAwait 6y ago
      I run Arch on a Surface Pro 7, (ironic, I know), which has a HiDPI display and the experience is good for me under GNOME, even fractional scaling is supported. One thing to keep in mind is that Windows/Mac/Linux do render fonts differently - they may not look identical to macOS out of the box, but there's a lot of configuration options (if you want to play with them) to get them to look the way you want.
      • throwii 6y ago
        I will probably use Arch too. Only have to choose good displays then :)
    • sgc 6y ago
      I don't use a mac but hop on other people's from time to time. I see nothing special there compared to my ~250 dpi ubuntu laptop.
      • throwii 6y ago
        250 sounds nice, compared to 220 retina ppi for macs. If its only constrained by the display that would be good. I will love buying 3080/5950x as my new workstation. hmm