I'll leave the "no strings attached" theory to the string theorists to work out. What I can't understand is why academics like Martin Nowak or Benedict Gross n

I'll leave the "no strings attached" theory to the string theorists to work out. What I can't understand is why academics like Martin Nowak or Benedict Gross never recommended chemical or physiological castration to Mr. Epstein in order to prevent their recidivist child molesting friend from re-offending. The most plausible explanation is the huge amount of money that was likely in play here from Mr. Epstein's estimated $500 million estate, which could have easily incentivized "moral relativists" like Martin Nowak and Benedict Gross to intentionally look the other way. In any event, Dick Gross once surprised a female graduate student in the Harvard math department by how he let his young children watch rather explicit material on cable television networks. Combined with the fact that attorneys at Harvard Law School like Allen Dershowitz have argued "on constitutional grounds" that we need to lower the age of consent to 14 in order to accommodate an oppressed sexual minority that includes his pedophile friend, mentor and client Jeffrey Epstein, it's not hard to understand why this former dean of Harvard College would argue to the Harvard administration in 2013 that their convicted child rapist "patron of eugenics," who was also suspected of trafficking hundreds of underage girls to other members of his pedophile ring that allegedly included professors at Harvard and MIT, was "an ideal donor" for Harvard, according to recently released documents by the Harvard administration.