4 ms·
But numbers seem to be up again, this article is speaking of another lockdown: https://t.co/2S9b4HfUhg https://t.co/2S9b4HfUhg
by raarts 6y ago
But numbers seem to be up again, this article is speaking of another lockdown: https://t.co/2S9b4HfUhg https://t.co/2S9b4HfUhg
- PaulDavisThe1st 6y agofrom that link: >The Avalon cluster has grown to 38, with 21 out of yesterday's 23 cases linked to it and another two still under investigation. It isn't fair and might not even be entirely honest to describe this to a (mostly US) audience with a phrase like "numbers seem to be up again". The trigger for Australia to go back into lockdown would be considered a giant fat ignorable nothingburger in almost every part of the US.
- shash7 6y agoFor context, that's in another state and the number has rose from 0 > 35 so its still manageable. You can't even remotely compare that to UK.
- raarts 6y agoI don't think I was, but every journey starts with the first step ;-). I think the Australian confidence of 'having eradicated covid' is misplaced. You can only eradicate a virus if you do that worldwide, and given viruses' capability of mutating, I think that's an unattainable goal.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- anotherevan 6y agoThat's in Sydney, which is over 700km away. It is also nothing like the scale that the UK is dealing with and will hopefully be dealt with by a short lockdown - possibly not even of the entire city of the politicians pull their finger out quickly enough.
- JimTheMan 6y agoYeah, raarts is trying to burn us by taking this sudden reappareance of a whole 30 cases in NSW seriously. Because here in Australia we take it that seriously. Short lockdown maybe, back to normal soon, not too many other places will be able to brag about that. We will be able to save all the lives prior to vaccination that nations with less willpower seem willing to spend.
- throwaheyy 6y agoThat’s a very weak argument. The “numbers went up” from single digits to 34, from a single outbreak that is actively being traced.