>It's frankly worse because he won't even admit he was lying Ah, the old classic. Should we start by cutting off a pinky? Or maybe bamboo splinters, for an int

>It's frankly worse because he won't even admit he was lying Ah, the old classic. Should we start by cutting off a pinky? Or maybe bamboo splinters, for an international flavor? He has been clear that he was speaking before transmissibility was known. First there was "no reason," then there was a reason. It's not hard, if you're not trying to intentionally misrepresent his words for some reason.