51 ms·
Don't take a footballer's advice as gospel. (He may be a smart footballer, or even a smart person. But even those are sometime wrong). Lacking emotional skill
by IfOnlyYouKnew 6y ago
Don't take a footballer's advice as gospel. (He may be a smart footballer, or even a smart person. But even those are sometime wrong).
Lacking emotional skills is, when profound, a disease called Autism. Which makes a lot of things really hard. I don't believe there to be anything comparable for lacking quantitative skills while being of normal intelligence otherwise.
There's a thing called dyscalculia, I believe. Have you ever heard of it? Have you heard of dyslexia? Is the latter one more widespread, or is it more profound? The answer doesn't actually matter for the conclusion not to worry too much about the phenomenon.
The best advice is to be excellent at what you're good at, while trying to foster high regard for other disciplines, an to find people and involve them where appropriate, and to try to track how useful their advice is and, if it is, to seriously consider it.
Incidentally, all those are emotional skills and, in my experience, lawyers are far better at respecting statistics or math than STEM graduates are at not sneering at any intellectual endeavour that doesn't glorify Richard Feynman.
(who, by the way, was the rare exemption. And not only because it would have been awkward for him to sneer at any discipline that doesn't glorify him)
- techbio 6y agoMight look to "Innumeracy" by John Allen Paulos. Though written a fairly long time ago, the subject fares better over time than many more qualitative ones.
- bo1024 6y agoI think your opening paragraph is disrespectful and dismissive. He's a well-published professional mathematician. Why wouldn't someone take his advice just because he used to play football? Also, this article wasn't about him giving advice, so...
- IfOnlyYouKnew 6y agoYes, indeed, I didn't see that specifically, although I figured as much from the domain and the book, which is why included "smart person", which was not intended to be ironic. But it can be misunderstood, and I apologise for any offence I caused. I was thinking of the following argument and cut it far too short: "Don't believe a mathematician that quantitative skills are the most important, don't believe a psychologist that interpersonal skills are most important, and don't believe a programmer that python is more important than English".