There may or may not be some interesting reasons for choosing rust, but also the original article does not even include Rust in the title. It seems like Rust is

There may or may not be some interesting reasons for choosing rust, but also the original article does not even include Rust in the title. It seems like Rust is mentioned solely for attention in this case. Would "A better way to search through academic literature" have been popular? Probably. How about "A better way to search through academic literature written in Java"? I assume not. Regarding moderation, its a thankless task which I don't envy and its hard to draw a line over nitpicky article titles when one has been voted in already.