As with most articles on controversial topics, it's not just what it says but that it might not fairly or at all represent the counter argument. I won't get in

As with most articles on controversial topics, it's not just what it says but that it might not fairly or at all represent the counter argument. I won't get into this specific debate, both because I'm not an expert and don't want to encourage a tangent. That said, removing an article for not encompassing the whole conversation isn't a good thing.