3 ms·

Having been on multiple juries involving suits between insurance companies and the people they were supposed to be covering, I know for a fact that you have no

• AnthonyMouse 6y ago
  You shouldn't have been on multiple juries where the insurance company didn't have at least a colorable claim, or the judge should have disposed of the case before it ever went before a jury. And if that's what happened your complaint is with the court system.
  • MisterBastahrd 6y ago
    This may come as a shock to you, but insurance companies have a lot more money than most individuals who are harmed on the job and will spend some of it if it will ultimately save them money. Employers are in on the act because they don't want increased premiums. Plaintiff: "any plain reading of the agreement stipulates that I am to be compensated X if I am injured on the job in a manner that results in me being unable to continue my job" Insurance company: "Clearly this video of this man washing his car over a 4 hour period, cleverly edited to pretend that he is taking just 15 minutes to wash the entire thing, is indication that he is capable of climbing a 100 foot ladder while hauling 60 pounds of equipment, even though he has four fractured vertebrae, had a surgically reattached lower extremity, doesn't have the core muscle strength to balance on a ladder, and can't lift 15 pounds without extreme pain" You're just beclowning yourself at this point. This is an every day occurrence in court systems around the country, but do continue to tell me how I don't know what I'm talking about because the system is virtuous.