4 ms·
The anti-masker movement would have happened anyway. There's no logical consistency there which is very apparent when you listen to their "arguments".
by pell 6y ago
The anti-masker movement would have happened anyway. There's no logical consistency there which is very apparent when you listen to their "arguments".
- varjag 6y agoIt would have certainly happened. It could also never have reached such a magnitude had health authorities not proclaimed for 3 months that masks are the new facehuggers.
- tertius 6y agoYes, except Fauci was against masks because of fake science, I mean because of supply. I.e He lied. (And has admitted it was because of supply). https://www.thestreet.com/video/dr-fauci-masks-changing-directive-coronavirus https://www.thestreet.com/video/dr-fauci-masks-changing-dire... And most anti-maskers are against it because of government overreach. Unrelated to science. A third party has emerged. The "we'll believe and parrot anything because it's what we're told". They act in the following realm (whether they are aware or not): Cotton/cloth masks don't work. But it qualifies as a mask so checkbox! Moral superiority is on my side whether science is or not doesn't matter.