3 ms·
Several years ago, Rolling Stone published story about a rape that allegedly occurred at a University of Virginia fraternity. It was the Washington Post and no
by rgovostes 6y ago
Several years ago, Rolling Stone published story about a rape that allegedly occurred at a University of Virginia fraternity.
It was the Washington Post and not Rolling Stone themselves that discovered holes in the story. But Rolling Stone owned up to it and engaged the Columbia School of Journalism to investigate the lapses in their reporting and fact-checking processes, resulting in a damning report which RS published in a subsequent issue.
https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/rolling-stone-and-uva-the-columbia-university-graduate-school-of-journalism-report-44930/ https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/rolling-st...
I don't expect NYT to be perpetually fact checking stories after publication, but when they "get busted," I absolutely expect them to re-investigate and publish their findings.
- listenallyall 6y agoRolling Stone absolutely did not "own up to it," they repeatedly tried to minimize the damage the article had done to the individuals and groups portrayed in it, and further, even after the Columbia report, stood by all its editors, fact-checkers, and even the writer herself! A good summary: https://web.archive.org/web/20150410094429/http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-04-06/rolling-stone-can-t-even-apologize-right https://web.archive.org/web/20150410094429/http://www.bloomb...