3 ms·
Yes, and it's extremely unsettling that we have absolutely no idea what causes it or how to treat it. But jumping straight to "There is evidence in mice" with t
by sillysaurusx 6y ago
Yes, and it's extremely unsettling that we have absolutely no idea what causes it or how to treat it. But jumping straight to "There is evidence in mice" with the implication of "try this yourself" is not justifiable.
- peatmoss 6y agoOn the other hand, even if it’s highly speculative, the cons for most people are “feeling hungry” and “a handful of other benefits that are supported by a growing body of evidence.” I’m all about rigorously testing the hypothesis over time, but the safety / risks of the intervention has been well studied for a very, very long time. “Might help and extremely unlikely to hurt” is not a bad basis on which to decide to take up IF.