4 ms·
This is a false equivalence with the argument GP made. It’s not healthy for society to have Bezos level wealth in one person. It will never be no matter the pol
by rorykoehler 6y ago
This is a false equivalence with the argument GP made. It’s not healthy for society to have Bezos level wealth in one person. It will never be no matter the political system in place.
- whatthesmack 6y agoIt isn't a false equivalence, though. From the original comment: > taxing the top ~1% is to simply bring their wealth more in line with their contributions The comment above yours is just pointing out that Bezos may contribute more, which would be an explanation for Bezos' outsize wealth. Whether it's true or not that Bezos contributes more is subjective, of course. > It’s not healthy for society to have Bezos level wealth in one person. That's an entirely different point unrelated to the "contribution" question/attribute.