I liked the book, and the (geographic network) advantage for Eurasia was a fair point, but the arguments that domestication couldn't work on most wildlife of th

I liked the book, and the (geographic network) advantage for Eurasia was a fair point, but the arguments that domestication couldn't work on most wildlife of the Americas struck me as pure survivorship bias. Really there are simpler answers for why a high density northern population would have to put up with animal husbandry, while any low density population with hunting opportunities would tend to find it a pointless burden.