3 ms·
That doesn't mean you need less RAM. That reviewer doesn't know what he's talking about.
by manderley 6y ago
That doesn't mean you need less RAM. That reviewer doesn't know what he's talking about.
- mrgordon 6y agoIf you assert that without discussing any of the points that I brought up then its not very useful. Why wouldn't sharing memory for certain large objects instead of copying them not make memory usage more efficient for many tasks?
- whimsicalism 6y ago> CPU, GPU, the neural processor, and other components Outside of the CPU, you're really not using the other processors for "many tasks."
- mrgordon 6y agoWell the storage is also integrated and most tasks use at least CPU + storage so those will benefit too. Not to mention if you don't use your GPU much then the memory can now be dynamically allocated to the CPU instead of remaining with the GPU. Intel has integrated graphics cards that share system RAM but that RAM is slower than traditional graphics RAM so they have terrible performance.
- whimsicalism 6y agoJust not how it works, but I don't really feel like engaging in an argument. Technical readers of this chain will know who is right.
- mrgordon 6y agoThen why comment at all? There was no argument, I was literally trying to reason how it could not be better and you chose to be rude instead of providing a single technical detail