2 ms·
That SF examiner article is ridiculously biased and immediately demonizes Ron because he chooses to be actively involved in the political process. What a hit pi
by nodesocket 6y ago
That SF examiner article is ridiculously biased and immediately demonizes Ron because he chooses to be actively involved in the political process. What a hit piece.
And what’s wrong with banning people from setting up tents on public sidewalks all over the city and claiming that public space as their own?
- redis_mlc 6y ago> And what’s wrong with banning people from setting up tents on public sidewalks all over the city and claiming that public space as their own? Because first you need an alternate place for them to go, which is the missing step in the bans on the Peninsula, which has also banned sleeping in vehicles. For those who want to learn how not to do it, watch the Caifornia Insider - Epoch Times interview about LA spending $500,000 per person on emergency housing spaces and basically getting nothing in return. (The non-permanent homeless budget in SF is currently $180 million per year.) How to Help the Homeless with Edward Ring | California Insider https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLqqypjBwC8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLqqypjBwC8