5 ms·

I want a no commentary, no sound, video of the M1 Mac usage. Like show me how it runs YouTube on Chrome for example. So tired of these reviews that don't show a

by s1k3s 6y ago

I want a no commentary, no sound, video of the M1 Mac usage. Like show me how it runs YouTube on Chrome for example. So tired of these reviews that don't show anything other than the opinion of some fellow that is either Apple-biased or doesn't cover my field of usage at all.

czzr 6y ago
This might work for you, if you turn the sound off: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UxSI45eeAts https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UxSI45eeAts
Closi 6y ago
What laptop are you on that struggles to play Youtube on Chrome?
- s1k3s 6y ago
  Nothing struggles. But the Intel 2020 Air is noticeably slower than the refurbished 2012 Linux Mint (and 2015 Windows) that I own. Disclaimer: I bought the Mac for building apps only.
  - jeffbee 6y ago
    The M1 macs are the fastest web browsing machines you can buy, by a huge margin. If that's your use case, there's no question what machine to get. The closest you can come with mobile x86 is to get the top-of-the-line 11th Gen Core i7, and the M1 beats that thing by almost 100% in browser benchmarks.
    - Closi 6y ago
      Yep, or alternatively an iPad Air with a magic keyboard. (Ducks)
      - jeffbee 6y ago
        Not even wrong. There's hardly a difference between the latest iPad and the latest MacBook.
  - jen729w 6y ago
    Interesting that the blame here seems to sit with Apple. Aren’t we asking why Google, who owns the browser, can’t make YouTube, a video player, that they own, work in that browser on 2020 hardware? YouTube is a turd. I do everything I can to avoid using it. How they’ve screwed up a video player that badly boggles the mind.
    - s1k3s 6y ago
      Oh, I'm not blaming Apple for anything here. I actually love my Mac Air, for the things its really good at. I'm blaming the so-called YT influencers/content creators that lie to their audience.
    - 43920 6y ago
      Youtube is basically optimizing for their own costs over that of end users by using VP9, which uses less bandwidth but often is software-decoded. So the real answer is basically that they can, but it would cost them more. (Of course, the YouTube frontend is also fairly bloated, which doesn't help. There isn't much of an excuse for that one).
- xxpor 6y ago
  My 2016 HP Elitebook G3 does. model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6600U CPU @ 2.60GHz It doesn't have hw acceleration for VC1, so youtube specifically has a lot of issues. I've been able to rectify it by using h264ify to force youtube to give me h264 but a normie isn't going to be able to figure that out.
  - lostmsu 6y ago
    I have 6100U and it seems fine...
    - deleted 6y ago
      [deleted]
  - fy20 6y ago
    I have the same processor in my ThinkPad T470s and it's terrible for anything video. Even a browser (Chrome and Firefox) tab in the background with a few CSS animations causes it to be noticeably unresponsive in other applications. It supports 4K output but my tests (backend TypeScript) are measurably slower when the display is at 4K vs 1440p. What OS are you using? I run Linux so I'm wondering if it's that, but I've tried every different DE and Xorg Vs Wayland and different drivers, and they are all just as bad.
ianai 6y ago
This kind of helps illustrate your point. It’s from the linked review titled “forget the performance the battery life will blow you away” https://techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/m1-dock.gif https://techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/m1-dock.gi...
turtlebits 6y ago
Not everything is going to cater to your needs. I was curious how homebrew works so this was interesting to me. Looks like I'm going to hold off for a bit. The title of the article/link could be a bit more descriptive though.
syntaxing 6y ago
What sort of usage are you looking at? I have a Mac mini M1 and MBA (Intel i7) that I can do some test on. Anecdata wise, my M1 runs noticeably faster than my MBA minus software incompatibility issues.
- s1k3s 6y ago
  If you record your screen for 10 minutes while doing common stuff like mail, web browsing etc, you've already beaten 99% of the tech review YT channels out there in terms of competence on reviewing something.
  - syntaxing 6y ago
    I wish this was true :/ But it was breaking people's webpage where the page won't load (including myself) and the menu you would normally when you click the icon on the bar was white.
tksb 6y ago
Is it the assumed bias or the lack of "coverage" that's most annoying? I see coverage but recognize the bias so I'm very genuinely curious what it is you're hoping for as far as reportage on bleeding edge Apple chips.
post_break 6y ago
I've got a 16GB ram macbook pro M1 I can show you maybe? Plugged into a 27" 1440p monitor in clamshell mode demolishing even my hackintosh at basic tasks.
christoph 6y ago
Switch the sound off and try this for how performant it is - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKRDlkyILNY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKRDlkyILNY Maybe not a real world use case, but in day to day use, it really does fly. Things I've noticed that are real world and noticeably quicker than my Intel MBP day to day - decompressing large archives (4gb+ ZIP files for instance), compressing folders with thousands of small files, opening very large XD & Photoshop files, etc. My MBP used to sound like jet engine when watching YouTube while doing multiple other things. I'm still yet to hear the fan spin up on this once.

by s1k3s 6y ago

czzr 6y ago

This might work for you, if you turn the sound off: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UxSI45eeAts https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UxSI45eeAts

Closi 6y ago

What laptop are you on that struggles to play Youtube on Chrome?

s1k3s 6y ago
Nothing struggles. But the Intel 2020 Air is noticeably slower than the refurbished 2012 Linux Mint (and 2015 Windows) that I own. Disclaimer: I bought the Mac for building apps only.
- jeffbee 6y ago
  The M1 macs are the fastest web browsing machines you can buy, by a huge margin. If that's your use case, there's no question what machine to get. The closest you can come with mobile x86 is to get the top-of-the-line 11th Gen Core i7, and the M1 beats that thing by almost 100% in browser benchmarks.
  - Closi 6y ago
    Yep, or alternatively an iPad Air with a magic keyboard. (Ducks)
    - jeffbee 6y ago
      Not even wrong. There's hardly a difference between the latest iPad and the latest MacBook.
- jen729w 6y ago
  Interesting that the blame here seems to sit with Apple. Aren’t we asking why Google, who owns the browser, can’t make YouTube, a video player, that they own, work in that browser on 2020 hardware? YouTube is a turd. I do everything I can to avoid using it. How they’ve screwed up a video player that badly boggles the mind.
  - s1k3s 6y ago
    Oh, I'm not blaming Apple for anything here. I actually love my Mac Air, for the things its really good at. I'm blaming the so-called YT influencers/content creators that lie to their audience.
  - 43920 6y ago
    Youtube is basically optimizing for their own costs over that of end users by using VP9, which uses less bandwidth but often is software-decoded. So the real answer is basically that they can, but it would cost them more. (Of course, the YouTube frontend is also fairly bloated, which doesn't help. There isn't much of an excuse for that one).
xxpor 6y ago
My 2016 HP Elitebook G3 does. model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6600U CPU @ 2.60GHz It doesn't have hw acceleration for VC1, so youtube specifically has a lot of issues. I've been able to rectify it by using h264ify to force youtube to give me h264 but a normie isn't going to be able to figure that out.
- lostmsu 6y ago
  I have 6100U and it seems fine...
  - deleted 6y ago
    [deleted]
- fy20 6y ago
  I have the same processor in my ThinkPad T470s and it's terrible for anything video. Even a browser (Chrome and Firefox) tab in the background with a few CSS animations causes it to be noticeably unresponsive in other applications. It supports 4K output but my tests (backend TypeScript) are measurably slower when the display is at 4K vs 1440p. What OS are you using? I run Linux so I'm wondering if it's that, but I've tried every different DE and Xorg Vs Wayland and different drivers, and they are all just as bad.

ianai 6y ago

This kind of helps illustrate your point. It’s from the linked review titled “forget the performance the battery life will blow you away” https://techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/m1-dock.gif https://techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/m1-dock.gi...

turtlebits 6y ago

Not everything is going to cater to your needs. I was curious how homebrew works so this was interesting to me. Looks like I'm going to hold off for a bit. The title of the article/link could be a bit more descriptive though.

syntaxing 6y ago

What sort of usage are you looking at? I have a Mac mini M1 and MBA (Intel i7) that I can do some test on. Anecdata wise, my M1 runs noticeably faster than my MBA minus software incompatibility issues.

s1k3s 6y ago
If you record your screen for 10 minutes while doing common stuff like mail, web browsing etc, you've already beaten 99% of the tech review YT channels out there in terms of competence on reviewing something.
- syntaxing 6y ago
  I wish this was true :/ But it was breaking people's webpage where the page won't load (including myself) and the menu you would normally when you click the icon on the bar was white.

tksb 6y ago

Is it the assumed bias or the lack of "coverage" that's most annoying? I see coverage but recognize the bias so I'm very genuinely curious what it is you're hoping for as far as reportage on bleeding edge Apple chips.

post_break 6y ago

I've got a 16GB ram macbook pro M1 I can show you maybe? Plugged into a 27" 1440p monitor in clamshell mode demolishing even my hackintosh at basic tasks.

christoph 6y ago

Switch the sound off and try this for how performant it is - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKRDlkyILNY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKRDlkyILNY Maybe not a real world use case, but in day to day use, it really does fly. Things I've noticed that are real world and noticeably quicker than my Intel MBP day to day - decompressing large archives (4gb+ ZIP files for instance), compressing folders with thousands of small files, opening very large XD & Photoshop files, etc. My MBP used to sound like jet engine when watching YouTube while doing multiple other things. I'm still yet to hear the fan spin up on this once.