3 ms·
> It aggressively hides the origin source, depriving sites of user traffic. What does this mean? If I click a link on an amp page, I may end up on the full sit
by joshuamorton 6y ago
> It aggressively hides the origin source, depriving sites of user traffic.
What does this mean? If I click a link on an amp page, I may end up on the full site, and if not, analytics and ads are supported. What do I lose other than the cost of rendering a page view?
- dmitriid 6y ago> What does this mean? You don't land on the original page. You land on a Google page. Even the URL says google.com. To get to the actual original page, you need to click on the tiny (i) in the corner. And even there the link is styled as non-clickable link. If you swipe, for example, you end up on the next Google property ^W^W that is a news item that Google displays on its own domain. And AMP may provably drive traffic away: https://kinsta.com/blog/disable-google-amp/ https://kinsta.com/blog/disable-google-amp/
- joshuamorton 6y ago> You don't land on the original page. You land on a Google page. Even the URL says google.com. Yes. So what? If I, from the AMP page, click on a link, I'll go to the full site (I just checked this on CNN's amp pages). Ads and analytics are still supported. > If you swipe, for example, you end up on the next Google property ^W^W that is a news item that Google displays on its own domain. This didn't happen when I just attempted it. > And AMP may provably drive traffic away: If you read the article, they say that they got more clicks and pageviews, but fewer conversions, likely because they hadn't spent time optimizing the AMP site for conversions.