4 ms·
> These are all user-friendly static site generators, basically.
by klelatti 6y ago
> These are all user-friendly static site generators, basically.
- cercatrova 6y agoI meant in terms of whether a backend constitutes a SSG or not. What's your point, I didn't understand it?
- klelatti 6y agoSorry probably crossed wires. Thought you were saying that the examples (eg Ghost) were all SSGs?
- cercatrova 6y agoI meant that they could create static (or static-like) sites in terms of what a reader would expect, ie changes propagate through a CDN, they have a CMS they can use to edit pages, etc. So it's not that the author wants a SSG necessarily, they just want something easy to use that creates websites, which is basically what Ghost and others do.
- klelatti 6y agoThanks and understood. Agreed that having a CDN makes Ghost etc much more SSG like.