You are correct in that CAF cases are against the property, and not the owner, and thus in that sense physical goods have no constitutional rights. But that do

You are correct in that CAF cases are against the property, and not the owner, and thus in that sense physical goods have no constitutional rights. But that doesn't mean that a CAF isn't an illegal seizure of property from someone who does have constitutional rights not to be deprived of their property without due process.