3 ms·
While I agree with your objection to the comparison of AMP and iframes, I think "with the publisers' consent" is a tough phrasing to swallow in this context, gi
by sbarre 6y ago
While I agree with your objection to the comparison of AMP and iframes, I think "with the publisers' consent" is a tough phrasing to swallow in this context, given that many publishers were put in a position of having to do AMP or risk seeing their content pushed down the page and lose a ton of traffic.
- Blahah 6y agoThat's because the publishers are dependent on Google, because they have no discoverability of their own. It's a systemic problem but it's not Google's problem that they are the only discovery platform for most media outlets. Those brands don't have the inherent value or reputation they think they do, or it wouldn't matter where they were on google results.