4 ms·
If you did disagree with the courts, you should have qualified your statement that “[the courts have ruled] property is not afforded the rights of humans and c
by hitekker 6y ago
If you did disagree with the courts, you should have qualified your statement that “[the courts have ruled] property is not afforded the rights of humans and cases can be levied against property directly”
Otherwise this comment (and the one you copy-pasted) looks like knee jerk damage control.
- vmception 6y agoI didn't state my opinion at all. Why do you think there is no latitude to just write accuracy statements? That shouldn't be a foreign concept. I don't feel the need to write disclaimers.
- hitekker 6y agoIt's fairly irresponsible to argue legal theory without a disclaimer. IANAL is an acronym for a reason. Of course, by this point, other people have seen through your rhetoric and have adjusted your comments score accordingly.