Seems too perfect that the same person supposedly guessed the password twice (first "yourefired", and then "maga2020!"). Especially if it was just by 5 manual a

Seems too perfect that the same person supposedly guessed the password twice (first "yourefired", and then "maga2020!"). Especially if it was just by 5 manual attempts, and not some sophisticated setup. Since the hacking is an "admission" by Gevers, my assumption is that neither side in the case were challenging whether a hack actually happened - instead focusing on whether it was ethical. The White House and Twitter "strenuously denied reports that the account had been hacked". While they have incentive to do so, I'm still leaning on their side unless there's further evidence.