3 ms·
It’s actually navigable, supports offline viewing, and isn’t a weird, messed up approximation of a real webpage the way AMP is.
by jolux 6y ago
It’s actually navigable, supports offline viewing, and isn’t a weird, messed up approximation of a real webpage the way AMP is.
- emodendroket 6y agoBetter navigation and offline viewing might make sense if I really want to read the New York Times specifically, but that probably isn't the case if I'm getting there by way of a search engine.
- watwut 6y agoYou complained about people using apps instead of web. Then you said "I'm not sure what the New York Times app would give me that AMP wouldn't" And when people answered with tangible good reasons to use app instead of web ... you move goalposts.
- emodendroket 6y agoOK, I can see what it might give you. Nevertheless I do not want to install apps for any but my most frequently visited Web sites.