3 ms·
You are _missing the point_. He could be signing that just fine but if the judge goes "nuh uh" that's it. Not to mention that isn't there a self discrimination
by emilfihlman 6y ago
You are _missing the point_. He could be signing that just fine but if the judge goes "nuh uh" that's it.
Not to mention that isn't there a self discrimination protection clause? Ie you can't be compelled to disclose information that would discriminate you?
- darkerside 6y agoWhat? Yes, I must be missing the point. He's not signing it, and if he did, he would not be in contempt any longer. I don't know why he won't sign it if the only reason for not supplying the coins is that he can't find them or remember where they are. This probably doesn't apply to self incrimination because it's not evidence of a crime, it is property whose ownership is in dispute.