4 ms·

For classical electromagnetic waves it's the relative position of the electric and magnetic fields. [1] There is a difference to Zeno's paradox, as a sibling c

For classical electromagnetic waves it's the relative position of the electric and magnetic fields. [1] There is a difference to Zeno's paradox, as a sibling comment suggests the impossibility. For a flying arrow we can assume that it's motion is driven by Newton's law, which is a second order differential equation for the position. Therefore you can't use the position only for initial condition to solve the equation, ie. you can't decide where the arrow travels from a snapshot of time. However the Maxwell equations that describe classical electromagnetism are a system of first order partial differential equations in terms of electric and magnetic fields. So if you know both the electric and magnetic fields everywhere at a given time point then in theory you can predict it at every future time points. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_radiation#/media/File:Onde_electromagnetique.svg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_radiation#/med...

keymone 6y ago
Would those positions not reverse for described “time-reversed” waves? Or would the simulated time-reversion look like normal wave because, after all, it’s generated normally?
- steerablesafe 6y ago
  Well, the time-reversed waves can't have the same electric and magnetic fields as the original forward waves, because they travel in the opposite direction. In principle the reversal can be achieved by flipping the sign either the electric or magnetic fields. This reversed wave still would "look like" the reversal of the original wave, as the light intensities match. In practice I expect that the mechanism to be much more involved than this. Traditional holography works by capturing a fine grained picture of light intensities on a surface or even in a volume, but it doesn't capture all possible information, certainly not both the electric and magnetic fields at a given time point. It looks like the researchers use a novel holographic technique to capture more information than normally possible. > In traditional holography, a 2D diffractive element encodes the complex amplitude of a 2D wavefront, which can be recreated by illuminating the element with a spatial reference beam. This new device can be thought of as an extension of this to an extra dimension; a three-dimensional (3D) diffractive element, which when illuminated with a reference pulse in a reference spatial mode, will reconstruct a fully volumetric optical field (2 transverse space and 1 time/longitudinal space). It is a type of reprogrammable space-time hologram. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-%20020-19601-3 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-%20020-19601-3
franek 6y ago
Thanks for the explanation and correction!

keymone 6y ago

Would those positions not reverse for described “time-reversed” waves? Or would the simulated time-reversion look like normal wave because, after all, it’s generated normally?

steerablesafe 6y ago
Well, the time-reversed waves can't have the same electric and magnetic fields as the original forward waves, because they travel in the opposite direction. In principle the reversal can be achieved by flipping the sign either the electric or magnetic fields. This reversed wave still would "look like" the reversal of the original wave, as the light intensities match. In practice I expect that the mechanism to be much more involved than this. Traditional holography works by capturing a fine grained picture of light intensities on a surface or even in a volume, but it doesn't capture all possible information, certainly not both the electric and magnetic fields at a given time point. It looks like the researchers use a novel holographic technique to capture more information than normally possible. > In traditional holography, a 2D diffractive element encodes the complex amplitude of a 2D wavefront, which can be recreated by illuminating the element with a spatial reference beam. This new device can be thought of as an extension of this to an extra dimension; a three-dimensional (3D) diffractive element, which when illuminated with a reference pulse in a reference spatial mode, will reconstruct a fully volumetric optical field (2 transverse space and 1 time/longitudinal space). It is a type of reprogrammable space-time hologram. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-%20020-19601-3 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-%20020-19601-3

franek 6y ago

Thanks for the explanation and correction!