3 ms·

I see where you're coming from, but I think the practical chances of a given chess player who hasn't played in a decade becoming GM-level are realistically simi

• Rerarom 6y ago
  Yeah but this would to me be an argument against chess in general, whether pre- or post-AI. Math is better, I feel like I can really contribute stuff that no one else would otherwise.
• nemo44x 6y ago
  Chess has to be the only game that regular people actually think they could become elite at. If you’re just picking it up in your late teens, there is basically no chance of becoming GM or even IM. Nearly every top-rated kid will never become GM for that matter. It seems like people really downplay difficulty of getting to that level. Even comments from the parent about hypothetically being able to beat Kasparov imply a certain misunderstanding of the vast gap between the 1% best players and the .01% best players. I suppose it’s fair to have fantasies about the possibility of beating the best of the best but the reality is for almost every person, a player like Kasparov in his prime is no different than a computer.