I am tired with Free software ideology which imposes a semi-arbitrary definition of freedom and fails to serve the interests of FOSS developers themselves. The

I am tired with Free software ideology which imposes a semi-arbitrary definition of freedom and fails to serve the interests of FOSS developers themselves. There are 2 type of FOSS software out there. Corporate sponsored, generally pieces of infrastructure / development tooling, liberally licensed and rightly so. Indie software, done mostly by volunteers on free time, there should be a creative commons like source-available NonCommerical license for it. Stallman's ideology of free for everyone doesn't make sense in the era of big tech. This is why I don't dislike commons clause or open core - we aren't entitled to anything, and definitions of FOSS are arbitrary and outdated at this point. At least these raise the standards of living for developers, while still allowing us to view / modify sources.