It’s interesting to me, because in my mind Reuters is characteristically a good actor in this space, often opting for more of a mouthful but not misleading titl

It’s interesting to me, because in my mind Reuters is characteristically a good actor in this space, often opting for more of a mouthful but not misleading title. It might have been an honest mistake? Although it would be surprising to me that a Reuters editor would miss the implication of this headline.