4 ms·
What is your point? Did she consent to and get paid for the porn she made in later years or not?
by drevil-v2 6y ago
What is your point? Did she consent to and get paid for the porn she made in later years or not?
- gamblor956 6y agoThe point is that she consented to the creation of the content and the distribution. As with GDP, part of Mia's issue was that the content was distributed outside the terms she agreed to.
- bonoboTP 6y agoGirlsDoPorn involved more trickery/fraud/misleading/coercion than distribution terms.
- gamblor956 6y agoTrue, but based on reporting the one common issue for all of the victims was that they agreed to make private videos for the private viewing of wealthy one-off clients in a far-away country and were not aware that the videos would be made available to the general public in their home country. Rape by fraud is a form of rape in some states and many countries.
- drevil-v2 6y agoI am sorry you will have spell it out for me because I still don’t understand; what were the distribution terms she wanted? And how would those terms have resulted in different outcomes?
- deaddodo 6y agoYeah, I understand the GDP complaints; but Mia Khalifa seems to be the odd choice here. Her most known video was filmed for a very well known porn company that was definitely known to distribute in the United States and the content was specifically meant to be controversial. If she was somehow misinformed, there’s gotta be some agency on her part (without victim blaming, if some manipulation occurred of course).