3 ms·
Going based on this Washington Post article, it seems its a DHS system called Einstein, which according to a GAO investigation/report was found to have had issu
by Scipio_Afri 6y ago
Going based on this Washington Post article, it seems its a DHS system called Einstein, which according to a GAO investigation/report was found to have had issues:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/ruusian-hackers-outsmarted-us-defenses/2020/12/15/3deed840-3f11-11eb-9453-fc36ba051781_story.html https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/ruusian-hac...
I think I found the full report here:
https://www.gao.gov/assets/700/696283.pdf https://www.gao.gov/assets/700/696283.pdf
"In that report, we also noted that NCPS was partially, but not fully, meeting most of its stated system objectives.34 Although the system’s intrusion detection capabilities provided the ability to detect known patterns of malicious activity on agency networks, it was limited in its capabilities to identify potential threats using anomaly-based detection. We also reported that although DHS had developed metrics for measuring the performance of NCPS, the metrics did not gauge the quality, accuracy, or effectiveness of the system’s intrusion detection and prevention capabilities.The department had also identified needs for future capabilities, but had not defined requirements for the capability to detect threats entering and exiting cloud service providers. Further, DHS had not considered specific vulnerability information for agency information systems in making risk-based decisions about future intrusion prevention capabilities.
The department had also identified needs for future capabilities, but had not defined requirements for the capability to detect threats entering and exiting cloud service providers. Further, DHS had not considered specific vulnerability information for agency information systems in making risk-based decisions about future intrusion prevention capabilities."
It almost seems like a roadmap for an APT... :|