3 ms·

That's because the problem is Taxation, not tax cuts, not the rich. If the USA Government was on Charity Navigator, it'd have a 0 star rating for overhead and

That's because the problem is Taxation, not tax cuts, not the rich. If the USA Government was on Charity Navigator, it'd have a 0 star rating for overhead and delivery. I'm 100% for gutting taxes until we measure results with what we spend. Every business measures their spend for efficiency and every financially savvy person also calculates the rate of return. Why we willy-nilly throw gazillions of dollars at the government to watch it being funneled into your Senator's Buddy's pocket is beyond me. If we're going to tax, the first step should be how to we measure the results.

inthewoods 6y ago
I broadly agree with you but measuring the results of some initiatives strikes me as very challenging. Two examples jump to mind. I remember reading about early childhood education investments. When the program was completed they saw no measurable results so the program was cut. Researchers picked up the study years later and did follow-up and found dramatic improvements in the children that were a part of the program. Now if the measurement endpoint was set to the 2nd point, the program would have been viewed as a success, but we have, as a country, an incredibly short term view. It would be extremely challenging to find anyone in the US government that would have invested in the program if they were told the results wouldn't be known for 40 years (positive or negative). The second example is military spending. This spend is done to keep us "safe" (others would argue it has other purposes e.g. to fund the military industrial complex or as a tool for stimulus). But if we take it at face value that military spend is supposed to keep us safe, what would be the measurable goal? I get the need for goals, but I think you need to understand the limitations. And I think we also need to focus on long term planning in this country.

inthewoods 6y ago

I broadly agree with you but measuring the results of some initiatives strikes me as very challenging. Two examples jump to mind. I remember reading about early childhood education investments. When the program was completed they saw no measurable results so the program was cut. Researchers picked up the study years later and did follow-up and found dramatic improvements in the children that were a part of the program. Now if the measurement endpoint was set to the 2nd point, the program would have been viewed as a success, but we have, as a country, an incredibly short term view. It would be extremely challenging to find anyone in the US government that would have invested in the program if they were told the results wouldn't be known for 40 years (positive or negative). The second example is military spending. This spend is done to keep us "safe" (others would argue it has other purposes e.g. to fund the military industrial complex or as a tool for stimulus). But if we take it at face value that military spend is supposed to keep us safe, what would be the measurable goal? I get the need for goals, but I think you need to understand the limitations. And I think we also need to focus on long term planning in this country.