I disagree. There were several incidents where she appears toxic (and we only know about the ones made public). 1. Absolutely refusing to update her paper with

I disagree. There were several incidents where she appears toxic (and we only know about the ones made public). 1. Absolutely refusing to update her paper with feedback from a colleague - the whole purpose of the internal review 2. Demanding that Google reveal who gave her critical feedback - presumably to attack them in some way 3. Sending an e-mail to her superiors/colleagues, making ultimatums and threatening to leave if her demands were not met 4. Sending a message to a group at Google, telling them to abandon any attempts to help Google with diversity initiatives and instead start attacking their co-workers 5. Publicly blaming Google and saying that she was "fired" for an e-mail. She was relying on information assymetry, knowing that Google would be hesitant to respond fully to all allegations